Artery Research
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 27-31, March 2010

Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity: Impact of different arterial path length measurements

  • Jun Sugawara

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA
    • Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan. Tel.: +81 29 861 7138; fax: +81 29 861 6660.
  • ,
  • Koichiro Hayashi

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
  • ,
  • Takashi Yokoi

      Affiliations

    • Institute for Human Science and Biomedical Engineering, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566, Japan
  • ,
  • Hirofumi Tanaka

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Aging Research Laboratory, Department of Kinesiology and Health Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA

Received 17 September 2009; received in revised form 29 October 2009; accepted 16 November 2009. published online 07 December 2009.

Abstract 

Background

Carotid–femoral pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the most established index of arterial stiffness. Yet there is no consensus on the methodology in regard to the arterial path length measurements conducted on the body surface. Currently, it is not known to what extent the differences in the arterial path length measurements affect absolute PWV values.

Methods

Two hundred fifty apparently healthy adults (127 men and 123 women, 19–79 years) were studied. Carotid–femoral PWV was calculated using (1) the straight distance between carotid and femoral sites (PWVcar–fem), (2) the straight distance between suprasternal notch and femoral site minus carotid arterial length (PWV(ssn–fem)−(ssn–car)), (3) the straight distance between carotid and femoral sites minus carotid arterial length (PWV(car–fem)−(ssn–car)), and (4) the combined distance from suprasternal notch to the umbilicus and from the umbilicus to femoral site minus carotid arterial length (PWV(ssn–umb–fem)−(ssn–car)).

Results

All the calculated PWV were significantly correlated with each other (r=0.966–0.995). PWVs accounting for carotid arterial length were 16–31% lower than PWVcar–fem. PWVcar–fem value of 12m/s corresponded to 8.3m/s for PWV(ssn–fem)−(ssn–car), 10.0m/s for PWV(car–fem)−(ssn–car), and 8.9m/s for PWV(ssn–umb–fem)−(ssn–car).

Conclusion

Different body surface measurements used to estimate arterial path length would produce substantial variations in absolute PWV values.

Keywords: Arterial stiffness, Applanation tonometory, Carotid artery

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1872-9312(09)00311-1

doi:10.1016/j.artres.2009.11.001

Artery Research
Volume 4, Issue 1 , Pages 27-31, March 2010