Journal Home
Search for

Volume 4, Issue 2, Pages 59-65 (June 2010)


View previous. 7 of 7

Combined imaging, computational and histological analysis of a ruptured carotid plaque: A patient-specific analysis

Giulia Solopertoa, Niall G. Keenanb, Mary N. Sheppardc, Jacques Ohayond, Nigel B. WoodaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Dudley J. Pennellb, Raad H. Mohiaddinb, Xiao Yun Xua

Received 8 April 2010; received in revised form 4 May 2010; accepted 7 May 2010. published online 25 June 2010.

Abstract 

Background

Rupture of carotid plaques is an important cause of cerebrovascular events. Several factors, including wall shear stress (WSS), plaque morphology and peak cap stress, have been associated with plaque vulnerability. The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between these factors in an in vivo human ruptured carotid plaque.

Methods

A 74-year-old male presenting with a transient ischemic attack underwent carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which indicated a ruptured plaque, followed by carotid endarterectomy, from which plaque histology was assessed. The carotid bifurcation was reconstructed from the MRI data, and three-dimensional flow simulations were performed using computational fluid dynamics to determine WSS and related parameters. Plaque vulnerability was assessed using a biomechanical method based on modified Glagov criteria.

Results

The plaque rupture was just distal to the site of maximum stenosis in a region of low WSS, where MRI and histology both demonstrated fibrous cap thinning, a large lipid pool and calcification in the shoulder region. Plaque vulnerability analysis indicated critically vulnerable plaque at the rupture site by a wide margin.

Conclusions

Both low and high WSS have been associated with plaque vulnerability, and high mechanical stress in the cap has been linked to plaque rupture, but these parameters are not routinely assessed clinically. This study demonstrates a complete analysis by combining imaging, histology and bio-fluid and biomechanical modelling.

a Department of Chemical Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, UK

b Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Unit, Royal Brompton & Harefield Trust, London, UK

c Department of Pathology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, UK

d Engineering School Polytech Savoie, University of Savoie, France

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +44 20 7594 5588; fax: +44 20 75941989.

PII: S1872-9312(10)00020-7

doi:10.1016/j.artres.2010.05.001


View previous. 7 of 7